2021-06-21 // day precision
Explaining OCS while mission partners look for a contracting unit
Posted by Dan Cary
Original source text
Original source (access may be restricted)
Editorial interpretation
A conspiracy-board explanation of operational contract support is contrasted with mission partners looking for someone to execute their requirements. Replies recognize the experience and invoke #OCSlife.
SOURCE DISCUSSION — transcribed original comments
2021-06-22 — Colten Atwood:
[No readable text or identifiable attachment was exposed by Facebook. This comment’s ID and date are preserved; its content is incomplete.]
2021-06-22 — Dan Cary — reply in Colten Atwood’s thread:
Colten Atwood #OCSlife
2021-06-22 — Shannen Duffy:
FEEL THIS ONE!!!!
2021-06-22 — Dan Cary — reply in Shannen Duffy’s thread:
Shannen Duffy [Reaction GIF not preserved as animation.]
Coverage: 4 visible comment records retained. One Colten Atwood comment has no readable text or identifiable attachment in the current UI; a Tenor reaction is link-only. Thread grouping follows source thread-root links; unknown immediate reply parents are not inferred. Dates preserve the displayed day, with timezone unknown.
The heading, alt text and opening historical explanation are AI-assisted editorial interpretation. The original caption, preserved image renditions and transcribed discussion are source material. Public images are metadata-stripped display derivatives of Facebook-served files; the original upload files and edit history were not established.
Topics: Early Years, June 2021, OCS, mission partners, organizational complexity