2021-07-19 // day precision
A terrible contract somehow performs just fine
Posted by Dan Cary
Original source text
Original source (access may be restricted)
Editorial interpretation
Tony Stark’s surprised reaction illustrates a carelessly written contract producing acceptable performance. The discussion offers a substantive counterpoint: shared understanding and working relationships can matter, while others sympathize with the joke.
SOURCE DISCUSSION — transcribed original comments
2021-07-20 — Brian Brammer:
I'm that idiot.
2021-07-20 — Tim Thulin:
[Reaction-only comment; animation not preserved.] [Reaction GIF not preserved as animation.]
2021-07-20 — Dan Cary — reply in Brian Brammer’s thread:
Brian Brammer I sympathize with you.
2021-07-21 — Chris Fisher:
It works when the government knows what it wants, the contractor knows what the government wants, and the contractor wants to remain on good terms with the government. Sometimes people put in too much thought into their contracts.
2021-07-21 — Dan Cary — reply in Chris Fisher’s thread:
Chris Fisher that’s asking a lot
Coverage: Five of five displayed comments captured; one reaction GIF animation not retained. Thread grouping follows source thread-root links; unknown immediate reply parents are not inferred. Dates preserve the displayed day, with timezone unknown.
The heading, alt text and opening historical explanation are AI-assisted editorial interpretation. The original caption, preserved image renditions and transcribed discussion are source material. Public images are metadata-stripped display derivatives of Facebook-served files; the original upload files and edit history were not established.
Topics: Early Years, July 2021, Contract performance, Requirements, Professional judgment