2021-07-13 // day precision
Let me check the FAR: no
Posted by Dan Cary
Original source text
Original source (access may be restricted)
Editorial interpretation
Bugs Bunny’s flat refusal reduces the experience of consulting the FAR to a punchline. It is an attitude joke, not a statement about a particular rule.
SOURCE DISCUSSION — transcribed original comments
2021-07-13 — Luke Martineau:
[Reaction-only comment; animation not preserved.] [Reaction GIF not preserved as animation.]
2021-07-13 — Joe Bac:
[Reaction-only comment; animation not preserved.] [Reaction GIF not preserved as animation.]
2021-07-13 — Joe Banaszek:
[Reaction-only comment; animation not preserved.] [Reaction GIF not preserved as animation.]
Coverage: Three reaction-only comments captured with author/date/source IDs; GIF animation bytes not preserved and provider labels are not comment text. Thread grouping follows source thread-root links; unknown immediate reply parents are not inferred. Dates preserve the displayed day, with timezone unknown.
The heading, alt text and opening historical explanation are AI-assisted editorial interpretation. The original caption, preserved image renditions and transcribed discussion are source material. Public images are metadata-stripped display derivatives of Facebook-served files; the original upload files and edit history were not established.
Topics: Early Years, July 2021, FAR, bureaucracy, early-years